How Hayek differs from Keynes

I found this great summary explaining how Hayek’s economics differs so much from Keynes’:

Hayek’s approach attacks, root-and-branch, the macroeconomic way of thinking. It is not simply a challenge to a particular theory of the determinants of mass unemployment, inflation, business cycles and the like. Hayek is not accepting the rules of the game or the parameters of the sub-discipline of modern macroeconomics.

Modern macroeconomics tends to assume that rules that apply at the micro level no longer apply (eg the Paradox of Thrift). Murray Rothbard in his History of Economic Thought (Vol 2, p195) had this to say on the split between micro and macro, beginning with David Ricardo in the early 19th century:

And here began the fateful and all-pervasive modern fallacy of a severe split between two hermetically sealed worlds: the ‘micro’ and the ‘macro’, each with its own determinants and laws.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s